Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicke
I agree with that, he should make a name of himself instead of using the fame of Stickman to draw viasitors.
He can have his own opinions as Stickman can have his, but to call a website notstickman and just critize him is just lame.
Stickmans views is HIS opinions and views, not neccessary everyone else.
|
I agree that having the same web design, and drawing traction from an already popular site to jump start his own is hitting below the belt. But, I was coming from the angle that more information is better than no information, unless it is misinformation. There are other articles that are not critical of Stickman. Just some more useful information, that's all.
I am certainly not anti-Stickman. Been reading his site for years and have made two reader's submissions.
Having said that Nicke, there was a link in one of the frames of a thread I was reading here on your site. Is it possible he linked to your site rather than vice versa. I'm no IT-techie, so I am not sure. I do know that a few weeks ago, this Galt guy admitted trying to link to Stickman's site and it was taken down.
The TanMan