Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LivinLOS
Osama is from a (mostly) Saudi family.
The Iranains were the rival to the Saudi's.
The US did appear to have a hand in financing and encouraging the early years of the disent / disruption if not directly certainly via indirect means.
|
Osama's family
excommunicated him years ago. But everyone seems to forget that. Most of his family (the royal Saudis) are good people compared with the monsters of the middle east. The US may have supported Afghanistan, but this is completely different from supporting Osama, because he was part of the Taliban, and the Taliban does not necessarily represent the majority of Afghan people (just as all radical religious muslim maniacs do not represent the majority of middle easterners). There is a huge difference between a terror group and the people of a country. Also, Russia invaded Afghanistan ... Russia was our enemy. Logically, it was the responsibility of the US to step in and help, even if it was through "indirect means." This wasn't the first time America and Russia engaged in such an involvement. Remember the Cuban missile crisis? Luckily, it ended safely, unlike the civil wars in Afghanistan.
It is no different from what happened to Kuwait in '90-91. Pretend there is a terror faction in Kuwait equal to the Taliban. Should that have stopped the US from getting Saddam out of Kuwait? Not at all. There are even terror factions in America, when you consider organizations such as the Michigan Militia, the Black Panthers, and people like Timothy McVeigh.